![]()
Photo EFE/ Szilard Koszticsak. This detail of the photograph on ArtDaily shows curator Zita Sor shot posing caught with Robert Capa’s famous image of a falling soldier, is at the centre of the storm of controversy that follows the iconic Capa image. Further questions about the authenticity of the photograph have been raised in the context of the traveling exhibition This Is War: Robert Capa at Work… “which re-examines Capa’s innovations as a photojournalist in the 1930s and 1940s with vintage prints, contact sheets, caption sheets, handwritten observations, personal letters and original magazine layouts from the Spanish Civil War, the Second Sino-Japanese War and World War II.” The exhibition is currently on display at the Museu Nacional d’Art de Catalunya until September 27.
One account in Aperture says yes: “Proving that Robert Capa’s “Falling Soldier” is Genuine: A Detective Story” by Richard Whelan. He concludes: “May the slanderous controversy that has plagued Robert Capa’s reputation for more than twenty-five years now, at last, come to an end with a verdict decisively in favor of Capa’s integrity. It is time to let both Capa and Borrell [the subject] rest in peace, and to acclaim The Falling Soldier once again as an unquestioned masterpiece of photojournalism and as perhaps the greatest war photograph ever made.”
Another is ambivalent: read Philip Gefter on photography and truth-telling in the NYT Lens blog. He concludes “…somewhere between fact and fiction — or perhaps hovering slightly above either one — is the province of metaphor, where the truth is approximated in renderings of a more poetic or symbolic nature.” Plus see a subsequent report in the NYT Art & Design pages…
Thanks to James Steele’s eagle eye (see comment below) Mail Online nails it with the before and after photographic evidence.
Yet surely this is not just a mere play of metaphor, or the outing of a propagandistic fiction? Beyond its iconic function, in its thousands of subsequent contexts, lies the reality of the subject of the photograph’s destiny: did Borrell live, or die? Now look at this…
![]()
What the? I’ve always wondered whether this anti-Soviet poster produced in Peshawar in the early ’80s was somehow based on Capa’s iconic image of the falling soldier. There’s plenty of evidence that the propaganda artists of this campaign were happy to appropriate other images from the West. This is one image that didn’t make the cut into Martha Vogel’s landmark study Roter Teufel: machtiger mugahid (Bohlau, Weimar, 2008). But if there was a relation between these two images, it’s surely a bizarre transformation! Compare and contrast with this detail of the Capa photograph… Is it a Yes? or a No?
![]()
PS the text on the poster is simultaneously ironic and mysteriously specific: along the top it reads (thanks to MR) “belakhare gheirat-mand shodi” which means “at last, you become zealous!” Or “at last, you gain honour!” This, as the man is being shot by an “askar” – which means a (“good”, ie, honorable) guard or soldier. The text on the black rectangle reads “Shendand” which may refer to events at the Shindand airbase, built by the Soviets south of Herat to give them a strategic influence over the Gulf region…
2 comments ↓
Remind me never to play snap with you – your capacity to spot resonances between images is a unique kind of super-power.
I’m with Gefter and Hitlon on this one. It’s a slippery slope from not letting the truth get in the way of a good visual metaphor, to outright propoganda. Where is the line? Is pretty bloody muddy.
It’s worth considering the commercial value of images such as “the falling soldier” in relation to their moral integrity. This photo was produced and in circulation at time when most people only had access to rumours and radio reports about the horror of war. Images of the dead and wounded were bought and sold with the same kind of voyueristic enthusiasm as postcards of topless “natives”. Rifling through the photographic collection of adventurer Michael Terry at the National Library of Australia recently (he was shooting images of Aboriginal people in the Australian interior around the same time Capa was shooting images of war) I found examples of both. In amongst a folder full of semi-pornographic images of dark-skinned women were a few photographs from the Boer War of soldiers bodies piled in pits. They weren’t his photos, but clearly he treasured them enough to hang on to them for most of his life.
As for the influence of Capa’s photo on the anti-Soviet poster, I only ask: how many ways are there to fall to the ground while holding something long in your hand? Perhaps not so many.
An article in Mail Online includes some graphics and a map detailing how the photograph must be a misrepresentation.
Leave a Comment